high quality cheap submersible pump for wastewater

Latest articles



Links

  • Lithopone 30% CAS No. 1345-05-7 / Nature and stability

  •  
  • Prof Maged Younes, Chair of EFSA’s expert Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), said: “Taking into account all available scientific studies and data, the Panel concluded that titanium dioxide can no longer be considered safe as a food additive . A critical element in reaching this conclusion is that we could not exclude genotoxicity concerns after consumption of titanium dioxide particles. After oral ingestion, the absorption of titanium dioxide particles is low, however they can accumulate in the body”. 

  • 2. Huntsman Corporation Huntsman Corporation is a global manufacturer of chemicals and plastics, with a significant presence in the TiO2 market. The company operates several production facilities worldwide and offers a variety of TiO2 products, including rutile, anatase, and speciality grades. Huntsman Corporation is committed to innovation and sustainability and continuously invests in research and development to improve the performance and environmental profile of its TiO2 products.
  • On November 23, 2022, the General Court of the European Union reversed the conclusion that titanium dioxide was carcinogenic and released a statement (1,2):

    First, the Commission made a manifest error in its assessment of the reliability and acceptability of the study on which the classification was based and, second, it infringed the criterion according to which that classification can relate only to a substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer.
     
    As part of our mission at CRIS we base our safety assessments on the currently available scientific evidence and consider many variables (e.g., study quality, journal of publication, etc.), even if it goes against previous conclusions. Evidence-informed decisions making is critical to ensure that the laws and regulations put into place are for the benefit of the population.
     
    The EU General Court maintains that the scientific evidence presented wasn’t the complete picture for the ingredient, “in the present case, the requirement to base the classification of a carcinogenic substance on reliable and acceptable studies was not satisfied.